DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Chambers

2008-06-25 Thread Ed Murphy
(Side note: N Agoran consent requires the ratio to exceed N, which for N>1 is a higher threshold than adopting an AI=N proposal. But that's okay.) BobTHJ wrote: > A chamber CAN through its own > internal mechanisms increase or decrease the power of any proposal by This should be a separate att

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Chambers

2008-06-24 Thread Ian Kelly
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 8:51 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chambers > AI: 3 This proposal still needs a lot of work. > A player who is a member of an existing public contract CAN make the > contract into a chamber with Agoran consent. Similar language has worked okay for contracts