(Side note: N Agoran consent requires the ratio to exceed N, which for N>1 is a higher threshold than adopting an AI=N proposal. But that's okay.)
BobTHJ wrote: > A chamber CAN through its own > internal mechanisms increase or decrease the power of any proposal by This should be a separate attribute called "authority". > an amount less than or equal to its authority index as a result of an "a non-negative amount", otherwise this runs into the "increase by -1" scam all over again. > Whenever the power of a proposal ever is equal to or exceeds its > adoption index then the proposal then the Rulekeepor SHALL adopt that > proposal in a timely fashion. "The Rulekeepor CAN apply a proposal whose <whatever> is greater than or equal to its adoption index, and SHALL do so as soon as possible." > The author of a proposal in the Proposal Pool CAN request it be > distributed to a specific chamber by announcement. Any Player CAN, > with 2 support, request a proposal be distributed to a specific > chamber. The Promotor SHALL distribute each such requested proposal to > the specified chamber in a timely fashion unless that proposal has > already been distributed to that chamber previously. > > The Promotor CAN remove any proposal from the proposal pool which the > author has not requested to be distributed within the past two weeks > or which has a negitive power. The Promotor SHALL remove any such > propoal from the pool in a timely fashion. Confusing. Why not just make distribution a one-time-per-proposal event? If its <whatever> is decreased, then the author may as well retract and re-submit anyway.
