comex wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I retract my previous proposal with this title.
>>
>> Proposal: Generalize complexity
>
> CFJ 1647.
In that case, I missed changing the proposal text. In this case, I'm
pretty sure I didn't.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I retract my previous proposal with this title.
>
> Proposal: Generalize complexity
CFJ 1647.
BobTHJ wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 07:18, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Presumably the idea is that high-rank cases would be more difficult,
>> complicated and time-consuming to judge, whereas low-rank cases would be
>> for typical CFJspam. The problem now is for people to decide w
BobTHJ wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 00:35, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Create a rule titled "Judicial Rank" with Power 1.5 and this text:
>>
>> Judicial rank is a player switch, tracked by the Clerk of the
>> Courts, with the same range and default as interest indices.
>>
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 08:09 -0700, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 07:18, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Presumably the idea is that high-rank cases would be more difficult,
> > complicated and time-consuming to judge, whereas low-rank cases would be
> > for typical CFJspam.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 07:18, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Presumably the idea is that high-rank cases would be more difficult,
> complicated and time-consuming to judge, whereas low-rank cases would be
> for typical CFJspam. The problem now is for people to decide which cases
> are imp
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 07:15 -0700, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 00:35, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Create a rule titled "Judicial Rank" with Power 1.5 and this text:
> >
> > Judicial rank is a player switch, tracked by the Clerk of the
> > Courts, with the sam
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 00:35, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Create a rule titled "Judicial Rank" with Power 1.5 and this text:
>
> Judicial rank is a player switch, tracked by the Clerk of the
> Courts, with the same range and default as interest indices.
>
> A player is po
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 23:35 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Create a rule titled "Interest Index of Judicial Cases" with Power 1.5
> and this text:
>
> Each judicial case has an interest index, which CAN be set by
> its initiator at the time of initiation, and CAN be changed
> by any p
9 matches
Mail list logo
