On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 07:15 -0700, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 00:35, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Create a rule titled "Judicial Rank" with Power 1.5 and this text:
> >
> > Judicial rank is a player switch, tracked by the Clerk of the
> > Courts, with the same range and default as interest indices.
> >
> > A player is poorly qualified to judge judicial cases whose
> > interest index exceeds eir judicial rank.
> >
> This seems backward to me. Wouldn't more judges be interested in
> higher interest cases instead of less?
>
Presumably the idea is that high-rank cases would be more difficult,
complicated and time-consuming to judge, whereas low-rank cases would be
for typical CFJspam. The problem now is for people to decide which cases
are important, hard to judge, and landmark-setting, and which ones are
just spam; everyone thinks their own CFJs are important, often...
--
ais523
