Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Preserve the Partnerships

2007-06-19 Thread Ed Murphy
root wrote: On 6/19/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I hereby submit the following proposal titled "Preserve the Partnerships" with an AI of 1: { Amend R2145 by appending the paragraph: {{ Agora recognizes an agreement that implicitly or explicitly assigns its rights, obligations, an

DIS: Re: BUS: Preserve the Partnerships

2007-06-19 Thread Taral
Yuk. On 6/19/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I hereby submit the following proposal titled "Preserve the Partnerships" with an AI of 1: { Amend R2145 by appending the paragraph: {{ Agora recognizes an agreement that implicitly or explicitly assigns its rights, obligations, and respon

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Preserve the Partnerships

2007-06-19 Thread Roger Hicks
Indeed, it would be redundant...but it would have add some stability to non-natural persons, allowing them to be based upon more than a judges interpretation of the word "person". BobTHJ This would just be useless text if the final judicial outcome is in favor of Partnerships anyway. Couldn'

DIS: Re: BUS: Preserve the Partnerships

2007-06-19 Thread Ian Kelly
On 6/19/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I hereby submit the following proposal titled "Preserve the Partnerships" with an AI of 1: { Amend R2145 by appending the paragraph: {{ Agora recognizes an agreement that implicitly or explicitly assigns its rights, obligations, and responsibili