root wrote:
On 6/19/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I hereby submit the following proposal titled "Preserve the Partnerships"
with an AI of 1:
{
Amend R2145 by appending the paragraph:
{{
Agora recognizes an agreement that implicitly or explicitly assigns its
rights, obligations, and responsibilities onto the parties of that
agreement
to be a non-natural person.
}}
}
This would just be useless text if the final judicial outcome is in
favor of Partnerships anyway. Couldn't we at least wait to see how
the appeal turns out?
Hardly useless, as it explicitly closes the potential gap in
interpretation that's recently been under discussion. In
general, just because the courts have decided something
doesn't mean that we shouldn't explicitly legislate that thing.
