On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 7:42 PM, Chris Blair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While that's where you *send* the random rolls, the roll results
> actually come from [EMAIL PROTECTED] That's what Taral was talking
> about.
Ah, thanks. I'd never actually noticed it wasn't coming back from the same
addre
On Dec 8, 2008, at 10:12 PM, Taral wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Benjamin Schultz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Time to test it. I am about to roll the classic 3d6; there will
be no game
actions in the roll other than a communications test.
... what do you think I did?
/me pushes
harblcat wrote:
> Graa.. To make it official, TTttPF
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Chris Blair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> While I don't question the adding of a dice server as a send-only
>> address, wouldn't it be proper to add the *correct* address? :)
>>
>> I intend to add [EMAIL PROT
While that's where you *send* the random rolls, the roll results
actually come from [EMAIL PROTECTED] That's what Taral was talking
about.
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Jamie Dallaire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] works just fine, no? That's where I always send my random
> rolls
[EMAIL PROTECTED] works just fine, no? That's where I always send my random
rolls.
Billy Pilgrim
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Chris Blair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I intend to add [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a send-only address
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Chris Blair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I intend to add [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a send-only address to the
> Business Forum without objection.
Given that this is just a correction of [EMAIL PROTECTED], which is
already approved without objection, I have simply made th
While I don't question the adding of a dice server as a send-only
address, wouldn't it be proper to add the *correct* address? :)
I intend to add [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a send-only address to the
Business Forum without objection.
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Time to test it. I am about to roll the classic 3d6; there will be no game
> actions in the roll other than a communications test.
... what do you think I did?
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there
On Dec 8, 2008, at 3:12 PM, Taral wrote:
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Benjamin Schultz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There having been no objection, I add [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a send-
only address
to the Business Forum. H. Distributor Taral, please let us know
when the
dice server can send
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There having been no objection, I add [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a send-only address
> to the Business Forum. H. Distributor Taral, please let us know when the
> dice server can send messages.
Done, but it won't work:
Dec 8
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hm. Could also be useful for TNP2, since it's been receiving a lot of
> Agora stuff that no sane person would read from Normish..
Addresses that can receive but don't want to can simply adjust their
mailing list settings:
http://ww
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I pledge the following:
>
> {Players may add or remove an email address as a "send-only address"
> to a specific Public Forum Without Objection. The Distributor SHALL
> take what actions are necessary to permit (or prevent, as appro
12 matches
Mail list logo
