harblcat wrote:
> Graa.. To make it official, TTttPF
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Chris Blair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> While I don't question the adding of a dice server as a send-only
>> address, wouldn't it be proper to add the *correct* address? :)
>>
>> I intend to add [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a send-only address to the
>> Business Forum without objection.
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Dec 3, 2008, at 8:22 PM, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Dec 2, 2008, at 7:20 PM, Taral wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I pledge the following:
>>>>>
>>>>> {Players may add or remove an email address as a "send-only address"
>>>>> to a specific Public Forum Without Objection. The Distributor SHALL
>>>>> take what actions are necessary to permit (or prevent, as appropriate)
>>>>> that address to send messages to that Public Forum.
>>>>>
>>>>> Parties may leave this pledge by announcement. This pledge terminates
>>>>> if the Distributor is not a party.}
>>>>>
>>>>> (For dice-servers and other automated systems.)
>>>> In accordance with this, I intend to add [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a send-only
>>>> address to the Business Forum without objection.
>>> There having been no objection, I add [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a send-only
>>> address
>>> to the Business Forum. H. Distributor Taral, please let us know when the
>>> dice server can send messages.
>>> -----
>>> Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
>>> OscarMeyr
Also, for completeness, I intend (without objection) to remove
[EMAIL PROTECTED] as a send-only address.
