Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not a cronjob

2010-08-28 Thread ais523
On Sat, 2010-08-28 at 23:31 +0200, Keba wrote: > Sean Hunt wrote: > > I set this Case's II to 1. > > I intend, without 3 objections, to set this Case's II to 2. > > I intend, without 2 objections, to set this Case's II to 3. > > NTTPF. > > The latter intend fails, as you may only increase or decr

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not a cronjob

2010-08-28 Thread Keba
Sean Hunt wrote: > I set this Case's II to 1. > I intend, without 3 objections, to set this Case's II to 2. > I intend, without 2 objections, to set this Case's II to 3. NTTPF. The latter intend fails, as you may only increase or decrease a Case's II by one. -- Keba

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not a cronjob

2010-08-27 Thread Ed Murphy
Wooble wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: >> I contest this NoV. I initiate a criminal CFJ regarding this NoV and >> submit it to the Justiciar. > > I assign this CFJ to Murphy, as I think e's the only eligible Judge. You also need to assign it an ID number (I sug

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not a cronjob

2010-08-27 Thread omd
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:41 AM, ais523 wrote: > Five times, I spend two ergs to destroy one of coppro's ergs. I spend two ergs to destroy one of coppro's rests. I spend two ergs to destroy one of coppro's rests. I spend two ergs to destroy one of coppro's rests.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not a cronjob

2010-08-26 Thread omd
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Warrigal wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Sean Hunt > wrote: >> I change my nickname to 'The Robot'. >> >> -coppro > > I publish a Notice of Violation accusing coppro of violating rule 2170 > (power 3) by changing eir nickname to "The Robot", a confusing

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not a cronjob

2010-08-25 Thread Ed Murphy
ais523 wrote: > --- On Tue, 24/8/10, omd wrote: >> In this case, the entity with the name "The Robot" will be >> coppro *at the time of the enaction of the rule*. Also: >> >> A document referring to an entity by name refers to the >> entity that had that name when the document first came to incl

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not a cronjob

2010-08-25 Thread Ed Murphy
omd wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: >>> It's 22-20 and the voting period is over. >> >> Not yet confirmed (I need to evaluate several conditionals and add them >> to the DB), but even if you're right, it's AI=2 so it would fail. > > For what it's worth, I get 20-19: >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not a cronjob

2010-08-25 Thread omd
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Alex Smith wrote: > Possibly relevant here: CFJ 2775, which found that a nickname change wasn't > effective unless Agoran players as a whole went along with it. The arguments > are rather specific to nicknames in particular, though, rather than names in > gener

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not a cronjob

2010-08-25 Thread Alex Smith
--- On Tue, 24/8/10, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, omd wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Kerim Aydin > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Sean Hunt wrote: > > >> I change my nickname to 'The Robot'. > > >> > > >> -coppro > > > > > > See CFJ 1520. > > > > In this

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not a cronjob

2010-08-25 Thread Sean Hunt
On 08/25/2010 01:55 AM, Alex Smith wrote: --- On Wed, 25/8/10, Geoffrey Spear wrote: I contest this NoV. I initiate a criminal CFJ regarding this NoV and submit it to the Justiciar. Who is the Justiciar, anyway? And is this the first time that power's been used, since its modern reintroduct

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not a cronjob

2010-08-25 Thread Alex Smith
--- On Wed, 25/8/10, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > I contest this NoV.  I initiate a criminal CFJ regarding this NoV and > submit it to the Justiciar. Who is the Justiciar, anyway? And is this the first time that power's been used, since its modern reintroduction, in a non-scam manner? -- ais523

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not a cronjob

2010-08-25 Thread Sean Hunt
On 08/25/2010 01:30 AM, Alex Smith wrote: --- On Tue, 24/8/10, omd wrote: In this case, the entity with the name "The Robot" will be coppro *at the time of the enaction of the rule*. Also: A document referring to an entity by name refers to the entity that had that name when the document firs

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not a cronjob

2010-08-25 Thread Alex Smith
--- On Tue, 24/8/10, omd wrote: > In this case, the entity with the name "The Robot" will be > coppro *at the time of the enaction of the rule*.  Also: > > A document referring to an entity by name refers to the > entity that had that name when the document first came to include > that reference,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not a cronjob

2010-08-24 Thread omd
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: >> It's 22-20 and the voting period is over. > > Not yet confirmed (I need to evaluate several conditionals and add them > to the DB), but even if you're right, it's AI=2 so it would fail. For what it's worth, I get 20-19: omd (5): FOR (I didn't

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not a cronjob

2010-08-24 Thread comexk
Sent from my iPhone On Aug 24, 2010, at 9:30 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > Not yet confirmed (I need to evaluate several conditionals and add them > to the DB), but even if you're right, it's AI=2 so it would fail. Proposal: Super Robot Powers (AI=1, II=1, Distributable via fee)

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not a cronjob

2010-08-24 Thread Ed Murphy
coppro wrote: > On 08/24/2010 05:28 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Sean Hunt >> wrote: >>> When Distributed Proposal 6808 is resolved and ADOPTED, >> >> s/When/If/ > > It's 22-20 and the voting period is over. Not yet confirmed (I need to evaluate several conditi

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not a cronjob

2010-08-24 Thread Ed Murphy
coppro wrote: > On 08/24/2010 12:27 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> Well, that's slightly more interesting, but the Proposal was a document >> that predated coppro's name change, so there's a case to be made that >> the Proposal's referent transfers to the Rules along with the actual >> language. -G. >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not a cronjob

2010-08-24 Thread Sean Hunt
On 08/24/2010 05:28 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: When Distributed Proposal 6808 is resolved and ADOPTED, s/When/If/ It's 22-20 and the voting period is over. -The Robot

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not a cronjob

2010-08-24 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > When Distributed Proposal 6808 is resolved and ADOPTED, s/When/If/

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not a cronjob

2010-08-24 Thread Sean Hunt
On 08/24/2010 12:27 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: Well, that's slightly more interesting, but the Proposal was a document that predated coppro's name change, so there's a case to be made that the Proposal's referent transfers to the Rules along with the actual language. -G. The language clearly says

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not a cronjob

2010-08-24 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, omd wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Sean Hunt wrote: > >> I change my nickname to 'The Robot'. > >> > >> -coppro > > > > See CFJ 1520. > > In this case, the entity with the name "The Robot" will be coppro *at >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not a cronjob

2010-08-24 Thread omd
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Sean Hunt wrote: >> I change my nickname to 'The Robot'. >> >> -coppro > > See CFJ 1520. In this case, the entity with the name "The Robot" will be coppro *at the time of the enaction of the rule*. Also: A document

DIS: Re: BUS: Not a cronjob

2010-08-24 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Sean Hunt wrote: > I change my nickname to 'The Robot'. > > -coppro See CFJ 1520.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Not a cronjob

2010-08-24 Thread Alex Smith
--- On Tue, 24/8/10, Warrigal wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Warrigal > wrote: > Also, without objection, I intend to interpret "The Robot" as > referring unambiguously to the (currently hypothetical) entity known > as The Robot that may be added to the rules in the very near future.

DIS: Re: BUS: Not a cronjob

2010-08-23 Thread Warrigal
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > I change my nickname to 'The Robot'. > > -coppro I publish a Notice of Violation accusing coppro of violating rule 2170 (power 3) by changing eir nickname to "The Robot", a confusing nickname. —Accuser Tanner L. Swett