--- On Tue, 24/8/10, Warrigal <ihope12...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Warrigal <ihope12...@gmail.com> > wrote: > Also, without objection, I intend to interpret "The Robot" as > referring unambiguously to the (currently hypothetical) entity known > as The Robot that may be added to the rules in the very near future.
I don't think that's actually a legit sort of dependent action. -- ais523
