Arkady English wrote:
> Ah, right, IADoP initiated the election, though I don't think I ever
> actually went inactive between nomination and election. (The census
> doesn't seem to think so...)
Sat 6 Aug 10:36:50 Walker declines Promotor and Rulekeepor; nominates
ais523,
Arkady English wrote:
> I accept my nomination.
NttPF
> (Do we have to do that? I can't remember, and
> don't want to go looking through the rules at work.)
Yes, unless you nominated yourself. Rule 2154 (Election Procedure),
relevant excerpt:
1) The valid options are the active players
On 20 October 2011 13:20, Arkady English wrote:
> On 20 October 2011 13:09, Arkady English
> wrote:
>> On 20 October 2011 12:49, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
I nominate Arkady English for Promotor.
>>>
>>> I nominate myself as Promotor.
>>> -
On 20 October 2011 13:09, Arkady English wrote:
> On 20 October 2011 12:49, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> I nominate Arkady English for Promotor.
>>
>> I nominate myself as Promotor.
>> --
>> Wooble
>>
>
> I accept my nomination. (Do we have to do
On 20 October 2011 12:49, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> I nominate Arkady English for Promotor.
>
> I nominate myself as Promotor.
> --
> Wooble
>
I accept my nomination. (Do we have to do that? I can't remember, and
don't want to go looking through
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Warrigal wrote:
>> I nominate myself for Conductor, and promise to publish a monthly
>> Agoran budget so you can see where your money's going.
>
>
> I nominate myself for Conductor, and promise to do the same
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> I never said permanent; I was under the assumption that the appeals
> processes were still going and it could summarily be finished off
> with a win and then repealed after them.
What ehird said. We've just been sitting on the dictatorship
On 16 Dec 2008, at 14:48, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
Other than this claim that the office of Rulekeepor
constitutes a permanent dictatorship, I think comex is doing a fine
job.
I never said permanent; I was under the assumption that the appeals
processes were still going and it could summarily be
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I nominate myself as Rulekeepor.
Sorry I'm behind; I'm very busy IRL.
On Oct 21, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 14:01 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Benjamin Schultz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What the
hey, I also nominate B Nomic for Conductor.
Fails. At least, I *hope* I didn't miss B Nomic becoming
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:01 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Anyway, if you want someone more capable in the office, don't vote for
>> Bayes. You could vote for me, although I wouldn't be nearly as fast.
>> Although if
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 14:12, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way, I'm also intending to (eventually) track credits and
> markers. H. Accountor, what would be your preference here? I could:
>
> * set you up to enter the data and publish the generated reports;
> * enter the data mys
comex wrote:
> Although if root starts publishing a web report updated more
> frequently than the email version, I for one will vote for em.
Incidentally, I haven't updated my old Conductor database since
around the time root took over, so please don't rely on it. I'll
take it offline once root'
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:01 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Anyway, if you want someone more capable in the office, don't vote for
>> Bayes. You could vote for me, although I wouldn't be nearly as fast.
>> Although if
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:01 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway, if you want someone more capable in the office, don't vote for
> Bayes. You could vote for me, although I wouldn't be nearly as fast.
> Although if root starts publishing a web report updated more
> frequently than the ema
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 16:01 -0400, comex wrote:
> (The reason I'm responding to one of these mass nominations seriously
> is that the idea of having Bayes as the recordkeepor for something
> intrigues me. It'd be a novelty having such a fast recordkeepor, and
> would certainly make scams like the
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I nominate the Monster, Bayes, the AFO, and the PBA for Conductor. What the
> hey, I also nominate B Nomic for Conductor.
I am willing to have Bayes take on the responsibilities of the office,
with the caveat that note
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nope, it hasn't registered yet. Also, it isn't a public contract yet
> because the B Nomic rules haven't been posted to the Agoran PF, and also
> I'm not sure if the proposal to add the Agoran public contract
> partnership boi
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 14:01 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What the
> > hey, I also nominate B Nomic for Conductor.
>
> Fails. At least, I *hope* I didn't miss B Nomic becoming a player.
Nope, it hasn't registered y
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What the
> hey, I also nominate B Nomic for Conductor.
Fails. At least, I *hope* I didn't miss B Nomic becoming a player.
ais523 wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 09:42 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> Burying hidden actions in large amounts of text is the oldest scam in
>> the book. It's not interesting at all.
> Well, in this case I'm trying to test the forum rules, and in particular
> R101. After all, as far as I can tell
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 09:06 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Right != actuality. In particular, R478's "should ensure e can receive"
> is pointless otherwise.
Agreed. I'm not sure if the ruleset handles this sort of thing well at
all, which is the main point of the exercise.
I'm confused.
--
ais523
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 09:42 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
> Burying hidden actions in large amounts of text is the oldest scam in
> the book. It's not interesting at all.
Well, in this case I'm trying to test the forum rules, and in particular
R101. After all, as far as I can tell R101 implies that you'
On 7 Oct 2008, at 16:42, Ian Kelly wrote:
Burying hidden actions in large amounts of text is the oldest scam in
the book. It's not interesting at all.
-root
The publicforuming, however, is.
--
ehird
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 9:39 AM, ehird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7 Oct 2008, at 16:36, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>
>> I nominate root, Murphy, and Wooble as Registrar.
>>
>> --Wooble
>
>
> Would you prefer a game where there were no interesting scams at all?
Burying hidden actions in large amount
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 11:39 AM, ehird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would you prefer a game where there were no interesting scams at all?
I'd prefer a game in which I didn't have to sit in a fucking IRC
channel all day long.
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 11:36 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I nominate root, Murphy, and Wooble as Registrar.
>
I nominate myself as Registrar.
--
ais523
On 7 Oct 2008, at 16:36, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I nominate root, Murphy, and Wooble as Registrar.
--Wooble
Would you prefer a game where there were no interesting scams at all?
--
ehird
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 09:18 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yer just in it for the deputization...
>
> No, I'm just opposed to officers blatantly abusing their powers.
You don't want to see what me blatantly abusing Mad
On 29 Sep 2008, at 14:18, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
No, I'm just opposed to officers blatantly abusing their powers.
The power is a blatant abuse in the first place.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yer just in it for the deputization...
No, I'm just opposed to officers blatantly abusing their powers.
On 29 Sep 2008, at 13:32, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I nominate Wooble as Mad Scientist.
Yer just in it for the deputization...
2008/5/15 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There having been no other nominations during the nomination period
> for this office, I hereby install ais512 as Mad Scientist.
>
> -IADoP Wooble
>
What/who is ais512?
ehird
On 9/16/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I nominate the AFO for Assessor.
I vote OBJECT, so I can say "I knew it."
--
Eris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
34 matches
Mail list logo
