On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 09:06 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Right != actuality.  In particular, R478's "should ensure e can receive"
> is pointless otherwise.
Agreed. I'm not sure if the ruleset handles this sort of thing well at
all, which is the main point of the exercise.

I'm confused.
-- 
ais523

Reply via email to