On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> On 20 December 2010 06:55, Taral wrote:
>> For the record: This is (and has always been) my standard practice. If
>> you get a message about your mail being held for moderation, you can
>> expect that it will be rejected unless you have made
On 20 December 2010 06:55, Taral wrote:
> For the record: This is (and has always been) my standard practice. If
> you get a message about your mail being held for moderation, you can
> expect that it will be rejected unless you have made specific
> arrangements.
No offense, but why?
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I retract this CFJ; Taral rejected the message.
What does that matter? The effect on your right to participation is identical.
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> Denied. As (a) the message has not yet been sent *via* the fora (see
>> whatever CFJ referred to that) and (b) the moderation does not violate
>> your right to participate in the fora (you had plenty of time to
>> change to a pastebin or whatev
On 10-12-19 07:28 PM, ais523 wrote:
On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 19:24 -0500, Sean Hunt wrote:
On 10-12-19 07:17 PM, omd wrote:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
I pay fees to destroy every erg owned by a player other than myself or
ehird.
As PSM, it's my opinion that your previou
On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 19:24 -0500, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 10-12-19 07:17 PM, omd wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Sean Hunt
> > wrote:
> >> I pay fees to destroy every erg owned by a player other than myself or
> >> ehird.
> >
> > As PSM, it's my opinion that your previous attempt to aw
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I pay fees to destroy every erg owned by a player other than myself or
> ehird.
As PSM, it's my opinion that your previous attempt to award ergs and
capacitors failed because you did not cite which cases you intended to
gain ergs from and which
7 matches
Mail list logo
