On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Basically, it's because I agree with your premise that I disagree with
> your conclusions. If contracts are primordial entities, then their
> interaction with agora is not as an intrinsic extension of Agoran Rules,
> but in how they as indepen
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, comex wrote:
> I disagree with your arguments fundamentally-- I think that
> contracts=agreements are primordial entities whose intrinsic scope is
> equal to the Rules'; the Rules merely recognize them and bless them
> with certain properties. Without an explicit clause to th
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 1:56 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> So, if the phrase is part of a contract, is it more like a Rule or
> a player's statement? It is in fact somewhere in between. In
> particular, while the text of a contract is judicable as a logical
> and legal construct, the Rules do not gra
3 matches
Mail list logo
