On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > Basically, it's because I agree with your premise that I disagree with > your conclusions. If contracts are primordial entities, then their > interaction with agora is not as an intrinsic extension of Agoran Rules, > but in how they as independent entities "communicate with" Agora, and > thus rules of generally unclear communications may be applied.
Hmmm... I hadn't thought of it that way. That makes a lot of sense.
