Yeah, that's what I meant. I'm sorry if it's not all that clear - I'm
doing my best, but these are my first judgments ever so I'm a bit of a
newbie here. =P I hadn't thought about setting precedent here by
saying it "failed", so I didn't consider my choice of words all that
carefully.
On Mon, Jan
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Jonathan Rouillard
wrote:
> I do not think that this was a scam, since I do not believe it was
> expected to succeed. I also do not see how this is an "abuse of other
> player's time and efforts" for that same reason. So, I think CFJ 1774
> isn't actually relevant
2 matches
Mail list logo
