On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Jonathan Rouillard <jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com> wrote: > I do not think that this was a scam, since I do not believe it was > expected to succeed. I also do not see how this is an "abuse of other > player's time and efforts" for that same reason. So, I think CFJ 1774 > isn't actually relevant - or if it is, it would actually support a > judgement of TRUE on this. At worst, I think ehird tried to vote 70 > billion times, and failed 69,999,999,990 times - since his votes were > later counted as FOR * 10. I'm not sure what the consequence of this > would be, but I think it falls outside the scope of this CFJ.
I intend, with two support, to file a Motion to-- well, I'm not a player. I agree with the judgement, but the argument is flawed because ehird did successfully cast 70,000,000,000 votes. Some of those votes were invalid at the time of casting and, as it turns out, remained invalid until the resolution of the decision, but they still affected the gamestate because ehird's voting limit could theoretically have been increased.
