Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Intent to clean up contracts from November and early December

2008-12-09 Thread Sgeo
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sgeo wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I wrote: >>> > Wed 5 Nov 00:58:13 P1 and P2 amended; P3 through P100 come and go >>> In case the previous message was ineffective: >>>

DIS: Re: BUS: Intent to clean up contracts from November and early December

2008-12-09 Thread Ed Murphy
Sgeo wrote: > On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I wrote: >> Wed 5 Nov 00:58:13 P1 and P2 amended; P3 through P100 come and go >> In case the previous message was ineffective: >> >> [snip the murders of partnerships P1-P100] > > I CFJ on the statement: P

DIS: Re: BUS: Intent to clean up contracts from November and early December

2008-12-08 Thread Elliott Hird
On 8 Dec 2008, at 02:09, Ed Murphy wrote: Sun 16 Nov 00:52:20 Unnamed pledge created by ehird I pledge not to redeem USD Vouchers specifying warrigal. Having received no objection, I terminate this contract. This pledge did not exist. It did not identify itself as public.

DIS: Re: BUS: Intent to clean up contracts from November and early December

2008-12-07 Thread Warrigal
>> Tue 2 Dec 23:27:07 Unnamed pledge created by Warrigal >>> I publicly pledge that if I get elected, I'll sort this out so that >>> harblcat, Siege and Charles get an equal chance. > > Having received no objection, I terminate this contract. This is also a Grand Poobah pledge, isn't it? --Warr

DIS: Re: BUS: Intent to clean up contracts from November and early December

2008-12-03 Thread Taral
> Wed 3 Dec 00:20:47 Unnamed pledge created by Taral > >> Players may add or remove an email address as a "send-only address" >> to a specific Public Forum Without Objection. The Distributor SHALL >> take what actions are necessary to permit (or prevent, as appropriate) >> that address to send me