On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sgeo wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Wed 5 Nov 00:58:13 P1 and P2 amended; P3 through P100 come and go
>>> In case the previous message was ineffective:
>>>
>>> [snip the murders of partnerships P1-P100]
>>
>> I CFJ on the statement: P17 has the Patent Title of Left in a Huff
>> Arguments: R649 talks about awarding persons patent titles, but then
>> does seem to imply that non-person entities can hold patent titles.
>
> Gratuituous: CFJs 1862 and 2093. Unless something relevant has
> changed since then, FALSE.
>
Gratuituous: Proposal 5412 changed a lot of instances of "person" with
"entity", but not the instance referred to in CFJ 1862. Proposal 5437
did not change any part of the rule relevant to this discussion.
