On 12 March 2012 05:28, Sean Hunt wrote:
> No, but the proposed rule does.
FOR
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 01:25, omd wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Sean Hunt
> wrote:
>> Proposal: Truisms (AI=3)
>> {{{
>> Enact a new 3-power rule entitled "The Cold Hard Truth" reading "Every
>> rule has an exception."
>> }}}
>
> AGAINST, Rule 104 does not have an exception.
>
No,
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Proposal: Truisms (AI=3)
> {{{
> Enact a new 3-power rule entitled "The Cold Hard Truth" reading "Every
> rule has an exception."
> }}}
AGAINST, Rule 104 does not have an exception.
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:31 PM, ais523 wrote:
> I pay a fee to move on the list to Grand Vizier (thus moving coppro out
> of that position).
>
> With Notice, I win the game.
Gratuitous: In this case, winning the game is not an action, but the
result of an action (making a Win Announcement about
On 11 October 2010 23:12, ais523 wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 14:04 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, ais523 wrote:
>> > Arguments: By virtue of having the office of Pariah, a player who has
>> > had no Rests for a week, and did not become Pariah in that time, CAN win
>> >
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 14:04 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, ais523 wrote:
> > Arguments: By virtue of having the office of Pariah, a player who has
> > had no Rests for a week, and did not become Pariah in that time, CAN win
> > the game by announcement (via a specific Win An
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, ais523 wrote:
> Arguments: By virtue of having the office of Pariah, a player who has
> had no Rests for a week, and did not become Pariah in that time, CAN win
> the game by announcement (via a specific Win Announcement: rule 2312),
> and likewise MAY do so.
As a followup,
Thanks, Murphy! Without you, I'd have to read the rules, and then
where would we be? :)
ehird wrote:
> I rebel! yaaar! What does rebellion do again?
Rule 2270, summary: when a player begins a coup:
a) The initiator is a rebel, the Speaker isn't, everyone else has
four days to become one (non-retractable)
b) The more rebels, the more likely the rebellion is to succeed
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Elliott Hird wrote:
> I rebel! yaaar! What does rebellion do again?
It makes you shout "yaaar!"
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 10/07/2010 03:20 PM, ais523 wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 15:15 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > > For each elected office not held by Murphy, I resign that office.
> >
> > This requires With Notice, if it even works at all.
> >
> > I intend, with Notice,
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> For each elected office not held by Murphy, I resign that office.
Fails; you didn't give Notice.
comex wrote:
If the Rules do not otherwise permit at least one current active
player to distribute a Proposal, then any player may do so
Without 3 Objections.
For any undistributable proposal, the rules don't permit at least one
current active player to distribute it, so any p
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 3:03 PM, comex wrote:
>> For each Undistributable proposal currently in the Proposal Pool, I
>> intend, without three objections, to distribute it, as permitted by
>> Rule 106.
> Won't work; all players can deputize to di
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 3:03 PM, comex wrote:
> For each Undistributable proposal currently in the Proposal Pool, I
> intend, without three objections, to distribute it, as permitted by
> Rule 106.
>
> --
> -c.
>
Won't work; all players can deputize to distribute any and all
Distributable proposa
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Sean Hunt wrote:
>> I CFJ the statement {This statement is FALSE.}
> I CFJ the statement {Immediately after this case is assigned to a judge,
> the set of appropriate judgments for this case is a subset of {FALSE,
> UNDECIDABLE}.}
Probably also
Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> I CFJ the statement {This statement is FALSE.}
>
> UNDECIDABLE. Note that this is not eligible to become a tortoise,
> since it is not about the possibility or legality of a rule-defined
> action.
>
> -root
I know.
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I CFJ the statement {This statement is FALSE.}
UNDECIDABLE. Note that this is not eligible to become a tortoise,
since it is not about the possibility or legality of a rule-defined
action.
-root
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 20:35, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> I withdraw my objections to all dependent actions.
>>
>> Having received objections from only Murphy and Goethe, I make
>> PerlNomic a contest with me as the contestmaster.
>>
>> I intend, without 3
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 20:35, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I withdraw my objections to all dependent actions.
>
> Having received objections from only Murphy and Goethe, I make
> PerlNomic a contest with me as the contestmaster.
>
> I intend, without 3 objections, to make PerlNomic a contest with me a
On Jun 27, 2008, at 5:08 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Benjamin Schultz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 27, 2008, at 4:39 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
I create and agree to the following pledge titled "Agoran Slavery":
{
1. This is a pledge titled Agoran Slavery. Every
2008/6/27 Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I create and agree to the following pledge titled "Agoran Slavery":
No.
2008/5/29 Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Wooble wrote:
>> I nominate Offhanded, ehird, and ais523 as Notary.
> I consent.
> --
> ais523
>
I turtle.
Does this involve me doing much work?
ehird
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Nick Vanderweit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 29 May 2008 10:12:03 Alexander Smith wrote:
>> Wooble wrote:
>> > I nominate Offhanded, ehird, and ais523 as Notary.
>>
>> I consent.
>
> TTttPF
Err, I think you meant "NttPF", although the forum doesn't matt
On Thursday 29 May 2008 10:12:03 Alexander Smith wrote:
> Wooble wrote:
> > I nominate Offhanded, ehird, and ais523 as Notary.
>
> I consent.
TTttPF
avpx
Wooble wrote:
> I nominate Offhanded, ehird, and ais523 as Notary.
I consent.
--
ais523
<>
On Nov 15, 2007 10:20 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The rules do not say that.
No, but the dictionary does.
> Also, if I am saying that I'm an ambassador by doing so, since the ambassador
> is not doing er duties, I could well deputise myself for it. :p
Only for the required
On Nov 15, 2007 10:13 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why? An embassy is quite different from an ambassador. ;)
Seeking to establish an embassy implies that you are an ambassador.
-root
On Thursday 15 November 2007 22:17:02 Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2007 10:13 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why? An embassy is quite different from an ambassador. ;)
>
> Seeking to establish an embassy implies that you are an ambassador.
>
> -root
>
Also, if I am saying t
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Ian Kelly wrote:
> Seeking to establish an embassy implies that you are an ambassador.
We're on a *choke* *gag* diplomatic *cough* mission
On Thursday 15 November 2007 22:17:02 Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2007 10:13 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why? An embassy is quite different from an ambassador. ;)
>
> Seeking to establish an embassy implies that you are an ambassador.
>
> -root
>
The rules do not say t
On Thursday 15 November 2007 22:09:30 Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2007 8:01 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I intend to have Agora join B Nomic as a B Nomic faction, with Agoran
support,
> > under the B Nomic name "Agoran Embassy (and spying organisation)". Why?
> > Just to
On Nov 15, 2007 8:01 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I intend to have Agora join B Nomic as a B Nomic faction, with Agoran support,
> under the B Nomic name "Agoran Embassy (and spying organisation)". Why? Just
> to put the fear of Agora into them. :p
That name could be viewed as
33 matches
Mail list logo
