Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Harvesting some lower-power amended rules

2008-10-10 Thread Ian Kelly
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Why is it 3 * floor(power) rather than floor(3 * power) to begin with? >> My recommendation for an equitable resolution is to amend the >> contract to match the practice. > > > [[WP:SOFIXIT]] Doesn't bother me enough.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Harvesting some lower-power amended rules

2008-10-10 Thread Benjamin Schultz
On Oct 10, 2008, at 1:08 AM, Ian Kelly wrote: On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Ben Caplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thursday 09 October 2008 10:53:28 pm Charles Reiss wrote: On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 20:37, Roger Hicks wrote: I create the following crops in the possession of ais523: 8, 3, 5

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Harvesting some lower-power amended rules

2008-10-10 Thread ais523
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 23:08 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Ben Caplan > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 09 October 2008 10:53:28 pm Charles Reiss wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 20:37, Roger Hicks wrote: > >> > I create the following crops in the possession

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Harvesting some lower-power amended rules

2008-10-10 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 1:08 AM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why is it 3 * floor(power) rather than floor(3 * power) to begin with? > My recommendation for an equitable resolution is to amend the > contract to match the practice. I'm not sure that's an equitable resolution under the cu

DIS: Re: BUS: Harvesting some lower-power amended rules

2008-10-09 Thread Ian Kelly
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Ben Caplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 09 October 2008 10:53:28 pm Charles Reiss wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 20:37, Roger Hicks wrote: >> > I create the following crops in the possession of ais523: >> > >> > 8, 3, 5, 3, 0, 1, 4, 6, 5, 9, 3 >> >> I

DIS: Re: BUS: Harvesting some lower-power amended rules

2008-10-09 Thread Roger Hicks
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 21:53, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 20:37, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 11:09, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 15:42 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: Amend Rule 911 by replacing t