On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 23:08 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Ben Caplan > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 09 October 2008 10:53:28 pm Charles Reiss wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 20:37, Roger Hicks wrote: > >> > I create the following crops in the possession of ais523: > >> > > >> > 8, 3, 5, 3, 0, 1, 4, 6, 5, 9, 3 > >> > >> I initiate an equity case. > > > > As a party to the contract in question, I submit the following > > thoughts regarding equitability: > > > > An equitable resolution of the situation would be for ais523 to > > destroy one 3 Crop and one 9 Crop. > > Why is it 3 * floor(power) rather than floor(3 * power) to begin with? > My recommendation for an equitable resolution is to amend the > contract to match the practice. > Well, if I remember, I'll try to hang onto the 3 and 9 crop in question until the CFJ in question is resolved (possibly tricky, as we need to find a judge for it). Does any non-AAA member want to sit up so as to be able to judge the case?
Possibly we need some rule specifically to allow us to judge equity cases against the AAA... -- ais523
