On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
> (I wonder what effect this has on the ruleset ratification argument?
> It's only a historical accident that the Agoran rule was repealed
> separately; without a ruleset ratification, we could therefore have been
> wrong about the Agoran ruleset for ages due
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Wasn't that repealed already? It's not in the latest SLR nor FLR,
> though comex's historical rules browser doesn't explicitly note its
> repeal.
Which reminds me to scratch an itch... For a while I've been recording
repeals in the RCS log, and
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> ehird wrote:
>
>> 2009/3/28 Alex Smith :
>>> I cause rule 2214 to amend itself by replacing its text with "Indy CAN
>>> cause this rule to amend itself by announcement.", using the authority
>>> from Open It Up.
>>>
>>> --
>>> ais523
>>
>> Contex
On Sat, 2009-03-28 at 23:21 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> To prove that, you'd have to prove that B's 5th Era was not only broken,
> but specifically broken in such a way that their alleged "Export"
> proposal was either (a) not a proposal at all, or (b) neither adopted
> nor rejected.
The proposal wa
ehird wrote:
> 2009/3/28 Alex Smith :
>> I cause rule 2214 to amend itself by replacing its text with "Indy CAN
>> cause this rule to amend itself by announcement.", using the authority
>> from Open It Up.
>>
>> --
>> ais523
>
> Context:
>
> This actually works because of B Nomic's gamestate. No
ais523 wrote:
> I cause rule 2214 to amend itself by replacing its text with "Indy CAN
> cause this rule to amend itself by announcement.", using the authority
> from Open It Up.
Wasn't that repealed already? It's not in the latest SLR nor FLR,
though comex's historical rules browser doesn't exp
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> I cause rule 2214 to amend itself by replacing its text with "Indy CAN
> cause this rule to amend itself by announcement.", using the authority
> from Open It Up.
Fails; the rule in question was repealed by Proposal 5942. It would
be interesti
2009/3/28 Elliott Hird :
> The Monster rules still exist, and Indy has a dictatorship.
>
No. Proposal 5942.
We murdered the Monster :-(
2009/3/28 Alex Smith :
> I cause rule 2214 to amend itself by replacing its text with "Indy CAN
> cause this rule to amend itself by announcement.", using the authority
> from Open It Up.
>
> --
> ais523
Context:
This actually works because of B Nomic's gamestate. No -- really.
The late fourth e
9 matches
Mail list logo
