On Sat, 2009-03-28 at 23:21 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > To prove that, you'd have to prove that B's 5th Era was not only broken, > but specifically broken in such a way that their alleged "Export" > proposal was either (a) not a proposal at all, or (b) neither adopted > nor rejected.
The proposal was never either adopted or rejected; the clock at B was broken, thus the proposal's voting period never started. On the other hand, as comex points out, the rule in question was repealed separately by an Agoran proposal, so this doesn't work. (I wonder what effect this has on the ruleset ratification argument? It's only a historical accident that the Agoran rule was repealed separately; without a ruleset ratification, we could therefore have been wrong about the Agoran ruleset for ages due to events at B.) -- ais523
