Pavitra wrote:
>It is possible for a judicial case to exist that has no subclass.
Ah, the Mousetrap loophole. I wrote the new judicial rules with the
intent that such an entity could not be created. What actually happens
to a CFJ of a subclass that is no longer defined by the rules is an
open qu
On Wednesday 12 September 2007, Pavitra wrote:
> I CFJ on the following statement, barring Levi:
> It is possible for a judicial case to exist that has no subclass.
Have you read http://www.nomic.net/~nomicwiki/index.php/MousetrapThesis ?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed me
2 matches
Mail list logo