Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Bribery (attn. Tailor)

2019-07-13 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
I favour this CFJ, and request that I be added to the list of interested judges. -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Thursday, July 11, 2019 12:11 AM, Jason Cobb wrote: > If I CAN do so, I award myself a Transparent ribbon. > > - I earned a Red ribbon for proposals earlier this week (81

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Bribery (attn. Tailor)

2019-07-11 Thread Jason Cobb
Ah, my bad. Gratuitous (or amending the arguments, whatever): G. has pointed out that I'm wrong about the final paragraph of my original arguments, so please disregard that paragraph. Jason Cobb On 7/11/19 9:50 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: On 7/10/2019 5:11 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:     I do note

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Bribery (attn. Tailor)

2019-07-11 Thread Kerim Aydin
On 7/10/2019 5:11 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:    I do note that Rule 2438 uses "qualifies" and "earns" somewhat    interchangeably, especially towards the end of the list (see R's    definition vs P's definition), which may muddy the waters somewhat. "Qualified" and "earned" are actually used v

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Bribery (attn. Tailor)

2019-07-10 Thread Jason Cobb
Ah, sorry about that, I probably should have stated that. Jason Cobb On 7/10/19 6:48 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 4:26 PM Jason Cobb wrote: Yeah the reason is Transparent. As for it being act-on-behalf, I wrote it in a bit of a hurry and that's just what I thought of first (

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Bribery (attn. Tailor)

2019-07-10 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 4:26 PM Jason Cobb wrote: > Yeah the reason is Transparent. As for it being act-on-behalf, I wrote > it in a bit of a hurry and that's just what I thought of first (and I > think it would technically work). I withdraw consent to the contract. Oh, my concern on leaving the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Bribery (attn. Tailor)

2019-07-10 Thread Kerim Aydin
Yeah - I'm not sure because it's never been litigated, but it looks like the gray method of being straight-up "awarded" short-circuits the "qualified or earned" part. On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 4:26 PM Jason Cobb wrote: > > Yeah the reason is Transparent. As for it being act-on-behalf, I wrote > it

DIS: Re: BUS: Bribery (attn. Tailor)

2019-07-10 Thread Kerim Aydin
I mean I can just make the award/exchange or a simpler agreement without act-on-behalf? Not sure if you're trying to time it specifically (doesn't count for Transparent by my reading if that's the reason). On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 8:02 AM Jason Cobb wrote: > > I create the following contract, a