I favour this CFJ, and request that I be added to the list of interested judges.

-twg


‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Thursday, July 11, 2019 12:11 AM, Jason Cobb <jason.e.c...@gmail.com> wrote:

> If I CAN do so, I award myself a Transparent ribbon.
>
> -   I earned a Red ribbon for proposals earlier this week (8182/8186/8187).
> -   I earned an Orange ribbon for proposals earlier this week (8186/8187).
> -   I earned a Cyan ribbon for deputising for Assessor earlier this week.
> -   I qualify for a White ribbon because I have never previously owned one.
> -   (?) I earned a Gray ribbon earlier this week by being awarded one by G.
>
>     I transfer 20 Coins to G, fulling my most recent Oath.
>
>     I CFJ: "Jason Cobb qualifies for a Transparent ribbon."
>
>     Evidence:
>
>     Qualifications for 5 types of Ribbon.
>
>     -   I earned a Red ribbon for proposals earlier this week
>         (8182/8186/8187).
>
>     -   I earned an Orange ribbon for proposals earlier this week
>         (8186/8187).
>
>     -   I earned a Cyan ribbon for deputising for Assessor earlier this
>         week.
>
>     -   I qualify for a White ribbon because I have never previously
>         owned one.
>
>     -   (?) I earned a Gray ribbon earlier this week by being awarded
>         one by G.
>
>         Excerpt from Rule 2438 ("Ribbons"):
>
>
> >            Gray (A): The Tailor CAN award a Gray Ribbon by announcement,
> >            unless e has done so earlier in the month. E is ENCOURAGED to
> >            award such a Ribbon in the same message in which e publishes eir
> >            monthly report.
> >
> >            Transparent (T): A person qualifies for a Transparent Ribbon 
> > while
> >            the number of other types of Ribbon that that person qualifies 
> > for
> >            and/or has earned within the previous 7 days is at least 5.
> >
>
> Arguments:
>
> This all comes down to whether or not being awarded a Gray ribbon
> counts as a ribbon towards the requirement that "the number of other
> types of Ribbon that [I have qualified] for and/or [have] earned
> within the previous 7 days is at least 5."
>
> It could possibly be read in under "qualifies" because I have, as
> per Rule 2548, "earned that type of Ribbon within the preceding 7
> days". I argue that I have earned the Ribbon within the previous 7
> days because I came to possess a new Gray Ribbon that I did not
> previously possess. If this is true, I have earned/qualified for 5
> types in the previous 7 days, as noted before, so I qualify for
> Transparent.
>
> I do note that Rule 2438 uses "qualifies" and "earns" somewhat
> interchangeably, especially towards the end of the list (see R's
> definition vs P's definition), which may muddy the waters somewhat.


Reply via email to