Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Betterer Pledge

2017-05-23 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
I don't think we should risk the mess of the conditional. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:05 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Tue, 23 May 2017, Quazie wrote: > > Would the following proposal be valid? I'm unsure if the subvoting > > mechanism i'm suggesting will

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Betterer Pledge

2017-05-23 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
天火狐 is right, the way it is written now, Agencies will mess with this. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 9:08 PM, Josh T wrote: > > A player CANNOT make any pledge that would create new obligations for > any other person. > > I think this should be changed to "A playe

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Betterer Pledge

2017-05-22 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 23 May 2017, Quazie wrote: > Would the following proposal be valid?  I'm unsure if the subvoting > mechanism i'm suggesting will work. Yes, we've used conditionals like this in proposals before, and no-one said they *didn't* work, as long as the conditionals were clearly resolvable. I

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Betterer Pledge

2017-05-22 Thread Quazie
Would the following proposal be valid? I'm unsure if the subvoting mechanism i'm suggesting will work. Proposal: "Betterer Pledges, with options, (BBoRWCDaPWDaLoEWSWW)" AI=1.7 Coauthor='G., Gaelan, Aris, 天火狐' {{{ Replace the text of Rule 2450 with the following: {{{ Breaking a publicly-m

DIS: Re: BUS: Betterer Pledge

2017-05-22 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 23 May 2017, Quazie wrote: >     A player CANNOT make any pledge that would create new obligations > for any other person or office, without the other party's explicit consent. He he - and you've reinstated contracts. (not that this is bad). The alternate reading is that pledges remain

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Betterer Pledge

2017-05-22 Thread Josh T
> A player CANNOT make any pledge that would create new obligations for any other person. I think this should be changed to "A player CANNOT make any pledge that would create new obligations for any other person or office, without the other party's explicit consent." 天火狐 On 22 May 2017 at 20:47,

DIS: Re: BUS: Betterer Pledge

2017-05-22 Thread Aris Merchant
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 5:38 PM Quazie wrote: > I submit the following proposal: > > Proposal: "Betterer Pledges, but because of reasons we can't define a > pledge without doing a lot of extra work, so we won't" AI=1.7 Coauthor='G., > Gaelan, Aris' > {{{ > Replace the text of Rule 2450 with the