天火狐 is right, the way it is written now, Agencies will mess with this.
----
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 9:08 PM, Josh T <draconicdarkn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > A player CANNOT make any pledge that would create new obligations for
> any other person.
>
> I think this should be changed to "A player CANNOT make any pledge that
> would create new obligations for any other person or office, without the
> other party's explicit consent."
>
> 天火狐
>
> On 22 May 2017 at 20:47, Aris Merchant <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 5:38 PM Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I submit the following proposal:
>>>
>>> Proposal: "Betterer Pledges, but because of reasons we can't define a
>>> pledge without doing a lot of extra work, so we won't" AI=1.7 Coauthor='G.,
>>> Gaelan, Aris'
>>> {{{
>>> Replace the text of Rule 2450 with the following:
>>> {{{
>>> Breaking a publicly-made pledge is a cardable offense.
>>>
>>> If a publicly-made pledge says that the creator of a pledge will do
>>> something,
>>> without providing a time limit, then e SHALL do so in a timely
>>> manner in order to not
>>> break said pledge.
>>>
>>> A player CANNOT make any pledge that would create new obligations
>>> for any other person.
>>> }}}
>>> }}}
>>>
>>> Me: Looks good! I'm happy you came up with such a nice proposal!
>>
>> Promotor: The office of the Promotor is officially displeased with you,
>> for submitting a proposal with an overly long name. We would appreciate it
>> if you could make it an annotation or something.
>>
>> -Aris & The Office of the Promotor
>>
>
>
