Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Because e deserves it

2009-02-27 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Alex Smith wrote: > On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 13:35 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: >>> It was created by the edited proposal 6072, when it was enacted, to >>> replace the repealed rule 2238. (CFJs have just ruled that the proposal >>> was successfully edited, and that the Agoran Decisi

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Because e deserves it

2009-02-27 Thread comex
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > Actually, that was proposal 6084 that would have repealed it, so comex > got the amendment in first; it's just that there was a subsequent mess > of CFJs, as always, and it seems e held off on setting off the win until > after it was settled, so

DIS: Re: BUS: Because e deserves it

2009-02-27 Thread Alex Smith
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 13:35 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > It was created by the edited proposal 6072, when it was enacted, to > > replace the repealed rule 2238. (CFJs have just ruled that the proposal > > was successfully edited, and that the Agoran Decision on it successfully > > enacted the edit