On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 13:35 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > It was created by the edited proposal 6072, when it was enacted, to > > replace the repealed rule 2238. (CFJs have just ruled that the proposal > > was successfully edited, and that the Agoran Decision on it successfully > > enacted the edited proposal.) > > Oh that's right, comex ignored the gentleman's part about not leapfrogging > 2238. I submit the following proposal, "because e is one", AI 1.5:
Actually, that was proposal 6084 that would have repealed it, so comex got the amendment in first; it's just that there was a subsequent mess of CFJs, as always, and it seems e held off on setting off the win until after it was settled, so as to prevent muddying gamestate even further. -- ais523
