On 7 Jan 2009, at 03:11, comex wrote:
I intend, with the unanimous consent of the current Partners of the
AFO, to admit ais523 to it.
Can I get in on the fun?
No?
Aw.
Goethe wrote:
As the AFO has identified itself as public, I hereby request a current
membership list and text of the agreement. H. Notary Goethe.
(If the AFO was not made public by its own internal consent, I request
to be informed of that as well).
This has multiple problems:
1) Proposal
On 11/27/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These are all excess CFJs, and I hereby refuse them.
>
> -zefram
>
They've all been retracted anyway.
On Nov 23, 2007 3:42 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is clear that the era of partnerships and contracts has degenerated
> into an era of petty abuse. So it has run its course. Sad, even by Agoran
> standards. Anyone (eris, root?) want to make the move now to get rid of
> them, a
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
> The most recent abuse by the AFO would work just as well with comex and I in
> agreement.
I said marks were ill-thought out at the time, it's part of the
clean-up. -Goethe
On Friday 23 November 2007 15:52:34 Ed Murphy wrote:
> comex wrote:
>
> > The AFO transfers 98 blue marks to comex.
>
> This was successful.
>
> > The AFO transfers 98 blue marks to comex.
> > The AFO transfers 98 blue marks to pikhq.
> > The AFO transfers 98 blue marks to Murphy.
> > The AFO tr
comex wrote:
The AFO transfers 98 blue marks to comex.
This was successful.
The AFO transfers 98 blue marks to comex.
The AFO transfers 98 blue marks to pikhq.
The AFO transfers 98 blue marks to Murphy.
The AFO transfers 98 blue marks to Levi.
These were not; the AFO had no marks left to t
On Friday 23 November 2007 14:42:47 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> It is clear that the era of partnerships and contracts has degenerated
> into an era of petty abuse. So it has run its course. Sad, even by Agoran
> standards. Anyone (eris, root?) want to make the move now to get rid of
> them, and sec
On Friday 23 November 2007 13:14:58 comex wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2007 3:00 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The AFO calls for judgement on the following:
> > - There are now elephants over there
>
> The AFO transfers 98 blue marks to comex.
> The AFO transfers 98 blue marks to come
comex wrote:
On Sunday 28 October 2007, Ed Murphy wrote:
The AFO spends 2 Red VCs to increase Murphy's Red VCs by 1.
I gave you the VLOP; you could have given Levi or I the VC...
Yes, but now I can spend it on one of you guys.
On Sunday 28 October 2007, Ed Murphy wrote:
> The AFO spends 2 Red VCs to increase Murphy's Red VCs by 1.
I gave you the VLOP; you could have given Levi or I the VC...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
root wrote:
> The point has been raised that the restriction should make players
> think before sitting up, but frankly, we need more judges, not fewer.
I'm willing to enter into some kind of binding agreement as a non-player
to return timely pseudo-judgments free of charge, if anyone wishes.
Mur
On 10/24/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Regarding Proposal 5261, CotC Zefram is evidently willing to
> delay processing a bit so that players wishing to lie down
> have an opportunity to do so.
The judicial system is often slow enough as it is. While Zefram's
consideration is apprecia
13 matches
Mail list logo
