DIS: Re: BUS: A Proposal

2016-09-17 Thread Nicholas Evans
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > I haven't though through the consequences of this at all. > Proposal: Agencies (AI=3) What's the goal here? We already have an organization system that spans seven rules and isn't well utilized. Why not amend that system to include these mech

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A Proposal

2016-09-16 Thread Alexis Hunt
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 2:16 AM Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > The whole proposal sounds a bit broad. Also, why the no conditions on > powers thing? > > -Aris > Doing it the other way seemed boring. -Alexis

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A Proposal

2016-09-16 Thread Aris Merchant
The whole proposal sounds a bit broad. Also, why the no conditions on powers thing? -Aris On Friday, September 16, 2016, Alexis Hunt wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 6:55 PM Owen Jacobson > wrote: > >> >> On Sep 15, 2016, at 1:22 PM, Alexis Hunt > > wrote: >> >> Proposal: Agencies (AI=3) >> {{

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A Proposal

2016-09-16 Thread Alexis Hunt
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 6:55 PM Owen Jacobson wrote: > > On Sep 15, 2016, at 1:22 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > Proposal: Agencies (AI=3) > {{{ > c) If the action is to be performed With T Notice, if the itent > was announced at > > least T earlier. > > > Typo: “intent" > > Enac

DIS: Re: BUS: A Proposal

2016-09-15 Thread Owen Jacobson
> On Sep 15, 2016, at 1:22 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > Proposal: Agencies (AI=3) > {{{ > c) If the action is to be performed With T Notice, if the itent was > announced at > least T earlier. Typo: “intent" > Enact a new power-1 rule entitled "TLAs" that reads as follows: >