2008/8/14 Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Not sure I agree. UNAWARE isn't appropriate for claiming ignorance in
> all cases, in fact in many cases it's not appropriate; there was
> sufficient goings on that e was aware that e could be punished (when one
> wants to demonstrate an unjust law, on
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
> 2082a: If tusho's stated belief that "failing speech acts were not
> illegal" was reasonable, then UNAWARE was appropriate and thus GUILTY
> was inappropriate. I intend (with the support of fellow panelists pikhq
> and Goethe) to cause the panel to judge
2 matches
Mail list logo
