On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Ed Murphy wrote: > 2082a: If tusho's stated belief that "failing speech acts were not > illegal" was reasonable, then UNAWARE was appropriate and thus GUILTY > was inappropriate. I intend (with the support of fellow panelists pikhq > and Goethe) to cause the panel to judge REMAND, instructing Prior Judge > OscarMeyr to consider whether tusho's belief was in fact reasonable.
Not sure I agree. UNAWARE isn't appropriate for claiming ignorance in all cases, in fact in many cases it's not appropriate; there was sufficient goings on that e was aware that e could be punished (when one wants to demonstrate an unjust law, one accepts the punishment to show it's unjust; that was my "dance" intent). -Goethe
