Well, maybe it would be better to make the Git repository the public
forum and maybe have it be hosted not on GitHub to resolve the outside
of TDoC and interface questions.
On 06/20/2018 05:36 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> Additional gratuity:
>
> There are currently several people who can push to th
Additional gratuity:
There are currently several people who can push to those links (via GitHub)
without the push/overwrite being visible or evident to someone following the
link. However, the underlying github repo (not findable from those links)
would show the commit history that can be cros
I, for one, would be willing to experiment with it, if we made sure that
there was strict protections both technically and in the rules to avoid
tampering or loss of information.
On 06/20/2018 05:17 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-06-20 at 17:11 -0400, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> wrote:
On Wed, 2018-06-20 at 17:11 -0400, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
> I raised the issue of having a certain GitHub repository as a public
> forum and people opposed it because it would not be within the TDoC
> of a member and it would break the precedent of mailing lists being
> public fora.
I favor this with significant deference to anyone else.
On 06/20/2018 03:16 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:10 PM Alex Smith
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2018-06-20 at 12:04 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> The FLR and SLR are up to date (up to Proposal 8052, and including
>>> revisio
I raised the issue of having a certain GitHub repository as a public
forum and people opposed it because it would not be within the TDoC of a
member and it would break the precedent of mailing lists being public fora.
On 06/20/2018 03:32 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-06-20 at 12:23 -0700, K
Just as some added fun, note that I found an error (in the "last change" date,
so not something required to be reported) - I pushed the fix so the current
*document* behind the link is not the one it was when I published the links.
Probably a moot point but there it is.
On Wed, 20 Jun 2018, Ar
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 1:21 PM Alex Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-06-20 at 13:17 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:33 PM Alex Smith
> > wrote:
> > > For what it's worth, I've opened the FLR in question so you couldn't
> > > now change it and have me see the new version (a
On Wed, 2018-06-20 at 13:17 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:33 PM Alex Smith
> wrote:
> > For what it's worth, I've opened the FLR in question so you couldn't
> > now change it and have me see the new version (and the use of Github as
> > an intermediary, who keep backups
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:33 PM Alex Smith
wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-06-20 at 12:23 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > Well considering I've still got a terminal window open, I could
> > change the link contents instantly to anything before most people
> > will have seen it. Definitely not out of my TDO
On Wed, 20 Jun 2018, Alex Smith wrote:
> Right, the message needs to contain enough context to find the action.
> I don't think that's a problem with the message in question, though.
So first, I don't think you could argue that I published a Document that
contained a report. So for the purpose
On Wed, 2018-06-20 at 12:23 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Well considering I've still got a terminal window open, I could
> change the link contents instantly to anything before most people
> will have seen it. Definitely not out of my TDOC if the content of
> those links is the only evidence.
>
>
On Wed, 20 Jun 2018, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-06-20 at 12:04 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > The FLR and SLR are up to date (up to Proposal 8052, and including
> > revision for the recent CoE on the Treasuror Rule):
> >
> > https://agoranomic.org/ruleset/slr.txt
> > https://agoranomic.org
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:10 PM Alex Smith
wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-06-20 at 12:04 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > The FLR and SLR are up to date (up to Proposal 8052, and including
> > revision for the recent CoE on the Treasuror Rule):
> >
> > https://agoranomic.org/ruleset/slr.txt
> > https://agor
On Wed, 2018-06-20 at 12:04 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> The FLR and SLR are up to date (up to Proposal 8052, and including
> revision for the recent CoE on the Treasuror Rule):
>
> https://agoranomic.org/ruleset/slr.txt
> https://agoranomic.org/ruleset/flr.txt
>
> I'm not publishing them, because
15 matches
Mail list logo
