I favor this with significant deference to anyone else. On 06/20/2018 03:16 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:10 PM Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> > wrote: > >> On Wed, 2018-06-20 at 12:04 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: >>> The FLR and SLR are up to date (up to Proposal 8052, and including >>> revision for the recent CoE on the Treasuror Rule): >>> >>> https://agoranomic.org/ruleset/slr.txt >>> https://agoranomic.org/ruleset/flr.txt >>> >>> I'm not publishing them, because there is (or was) a message size- >>> limit on BUS that was specifically removed in OFF for the purpose of >>> ruleset publication. I don't want to add to any confusion in case >>> the rulesets bounce from BUS. >> Are you sure this isn't publishing them? People have been able to >> publish things as attachements, hidden in headers, etc. with a >> reference to them in the main message, so I don't see why posting a URL >> that has consistent, known information would necessarily be different. >> >> This may satisfy a requirement to post the rulesets, and if it doesn't >> it's probably because of your disclaimer. > > I'm inclined to think that the disclaimer is ineffective for that purpose. > A report occurs when an officer publishes certain information, whether they > want it to or not. Posting the links may count for that purpose, as long as > the text on the other end is labeled as a report, and has all required > information. > > CFJ: G. has satisfied eir weekly obligation with regard to the FLR and SLR. > > Arguments: See above. > > -Aris > >>
-- ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
