On 6/19/20 5:54 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Is "intent to pay that fee" strong enough? It doesn't seem to me as if
> that necessarily requires the payment being possible or succeeding.
This is the existing wording, and is protected by the next paragraph.
--
On 6/18/20 11:42 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> On 6/18/20 3:22 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> I submit (but do not pend) the following proposal:
>>
>> Title: Fee-based mechanisms
>>
>> Author: Jason
>>
>> Coauthors: Falsifian
>>
>> Adoption index: 3.0
>
>
> I withdraw th
On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 at 03:32, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 6/18/20 11:29 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> > What would the text look like then? (I don't follow how the "invoke"
> > phrasing relates to the requirement about specifying zero fee.)
>
>
> I would phrase it as
On 6/18/20 11:29 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
> What would the text look like then? (I don't follow how the "invoke"
> phrasing relates to the requirement about specifying zero fee.)
I would phrase it as "If a fee-based method to perform an action has a
fee of no assets, that action
> >> If the Rules define a fee-based mechanism to perform an action, but the
> >> specified set of assets is the empty set, then the mechanism can be
> >> invoked by announcement, but the announcement must include that there is
> >> an (empty or 0) fee for the mechanism.
> > I'm not sure if the mea
On 6/18/20 11:08 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote:
>> If the Rules associate payment of a set of actions (hereafter the fee
> s/actions/assets/
Thanks, fixed on local copy.
>
>> for the action; syns: cost, price charge) with performing an action,
> You lost a comma after "price".
Fix
> If the Rules associate payment of a set of actions (hereafter the fee
s/actions/assets/
> for the action; syns: cost, price charge) with performing an action,
You lost a comma after "price".
> that mechanism for performing that action is a fee-based mechanism.
Shouldn't it be "method" rather
7 matches
Mail list logo
