Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Mooting moots

2020-05-20 Thread Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 3:45 PM James Cook wrote: > > > I had been under the impression that the current case of CFJ 3831 is > > > sort of like that, since I don't remember people disagreeing with the > > > judgement until somewhat later. > > > > Yes the main issue was there wasn't a peep of compla

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Mooting moots

2020-05-20 Thread James Cook via agora-discussion
> > I had been under the impression that the current case of CFJ 3831 is > > sort of like that, since I don't remember people disagreeing with the > > judgement until somewhat later. > > Yes the main issue was there wasn't a peep of complaint for the first > 2 weeks (at least that I saw). There sh

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Mooting moots

2020-05-20 Thread Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 3:07 PM James Cook via agora-discussion wrote: > Why the third requirement? What if someone notices a problem with a > judgement 10 days after it's assigned, and there was no motion to > reconsider? The idea is a fixed progression: first you remand via a motion to give the

DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Mooting moots

2020-05-20 Thread James Cook via agora-discussion
On Wed, 20 May 2020 at 01:26, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote: > I submit the following proposal, "Mooting moots", co-author R. Lee, AI-1.7: > > > > Amend Rule 911 (Motions and Moots) by deleting all the text from "If a