On 7/5/09 1:16 PM, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
> Charles Reiss wrote:
>> On 7/5/09 12:42 PM, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
>>> Having received the necessary consent, I cause the LPRS to intend with
>>> Agoran Consent to register.
>>>
>>> I support.
>>
>> You CANNOT.
>
> Yes I can. The LPRS is the initiator
Charles Reiss wrote:
> On 7/5/09 12:42 PM, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
>> Having received the necessary consent, I cause the LPRS to intend with
>> Agoran Consent to register.
>>
>> I support.
>
> You CANNOT.
Yes I can. The LPRS is the initiator of the intent, not me.
Benjamin Caplan wrote:
> I intend, with the majority consent of {coppro, C-walker, BobTHJ} to
> amend the LPRS by appending the following paragraph to section I.
> GENERAL CONTRACTY STUFF:
> {
> This contract contains the string "inferences".
> }
Err, just ignore that.
> I'm guessing you switched to "Compose messages as plain
> text" from
> "Compose messages as color and graphics" in the options?
Actually, since I'm using Yahoo Webmail, I had to change to classic mode (I
didn't realize it was still available), and then the plaintext button was right
there in
Gabriel Vistica wrote:
>>Gabriel Vistica wrote:
>>> comex wrote:
Just a heads up: it's good form to use plain text rather than HTML
mil on the list.
>>>
>>> Got it. Shouldn't be a problem anyway, since my HTML is mostly
>>> limited to newlines, links, and basic text formatting, and it's
>Gabriel Vistica wrote:
>> comex wrote:
>>> Just a heads up: it's good form to use plain text rather than HTML
>>> mil on the list.
>>
>> Got it. Shouldn't be a problem anyway, since my HTML is mostly
>> limited to newlines, links, and basic text formatting, and it's a
>> little rusty.
>
>I don'
Gabriel Vistica wrote:
> comex wrote:
>> Just a heads up: it's good form to use plain text rather than HTML
>> mil on the list.
>
> Got it. Shouldn't be a problem anyway, since my HTML is mostly
> limited to newlines, links, and basic text formatting, and it's a
> little rusty.
I don't know whet
comex wrote:
>Just a heads up: it's good form to use plain text rather than HTML
>mil on the list.
Got it. Shouldn't be a problem anyway, since my HTML is mostly limited to
newlines, links, and basic text formatting, and it's a little rusty.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Gabriel Vistica wrote:
> Thanks, guys!
Just a heads up: it's good form to use plain text rather than HTML
mail on the list.
--
-c.
Thanks, guys!
Benjamin Caplan wrote:
> Gabriel Vistica wrote:
>>> Proposal 6380, if it passes, should make the whole thing
>>> irrelevant.
>>
>> Irrelevant as in stopping the contract's attempt and preventing
>> transfers, or as in making the contract redundant by allowing
>> transfers?
>> (I haven't really
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Gabriel Vistica wrote:
>>Proposal 6380, if it passes, should make the whole thing irrelevant.
>
> Irrelevant as in stopping the contract's attempt and preventing transfers,
> or as in making the contract redundant by allowing transfers?
> (I haven't really had a cha
Gabriel Vistica wrote:
>> Proposal 6380, if it passes, should make the whole thing
>> irrelevant.
>
> Irrelevant as in stopping the contract's attempt and preventing
> transfers, or as in making the contract redundant by allowing
> transfers?
> (I haven't really had a chance to get a feel for t
>Gabriel Vistica wrote:
>>>Roger Hicks wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 15:12, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
> Unless someone else joins, the LPRS will only be a person for the next
> week, so I won't bother re-intending intending registration.
>
I join the LPRS.
>>>
>>>I intend, with t
compsciguy wrote:
> Checked the short and full rulesets, and I can't find it anywhere. What
> is the LPRS?
A fair amount of gameplay is governed by contracts rather than
rules. In this case, see
http://agora-notary.wikidot.com/lesser-points-relay-service
Gabriel Vistica wrote:
>>Roger Hicks wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 15:12, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
Unless someone else joins, the LPRS will only be a person for the next
week, so I won't bother re-intending intending registration.
>>> I join the LPRS.
>>
>>I intend, with the majori
>Roger Hicks wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 15:12, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
>>> Unless someone else joins, the LPRS will only be a person for the next
>>> week, so I won't bother re-intending intending registration.
>>>
>> I join the LPRS.
>
>I intend, with the majority consent of {coppro, C-walker
C-walker wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:26 AM, Benjamin
> Caplan wrote:
>> [I forgot about the LPRS because it hasn't been used. You can NoV me for
>> slacking off if you care, but I'm guessing you don't.]
>>
>> Parties to the LPRS:
>> Pavitra [Pointer]
>> coppro
>
> You two look lonely. I jo
18 matches
Mail list logo
