>Gabriel Vistica wrote:
>>>Roger Hicks wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 15:12, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
>>>>> Unless someone else joins, the LPRS will only be a person for the next
>>>>> week, so I won't bother re-intending intending registration.
>>>>>
>>>> I join the LPRS.
>>>
>>>I intend, with the majority consent of {coppro, C-walker, BobTHJ}, to
>>>cause the LPRS to intend with Agoran Consent to register.
>>>
>>>Pavitra
>>
>> Checked the short and full rulesets, and I can't find it anywhere. What is
>> the LPRS?
>>
>> compsciguy
>
>It's a contract. It's not in the rulesets because it's defined in the
>private sector. It's one instance of a recurring attempt to
>non-legislatively get around the Rules saying that points can't be
>transferred.
>
>Proposal 6380, if it passes, should make the whole thing irrelevant.
Irrelevant as in stopping the contract's attempt and preventing transfers, or
as in making the contract redundant by allowing transfers?
(I haven't really had a chance to get a feel for the game and the players yet,
though I'm expecting the answer to be "stopping the contract". In case you are
all wondering, I'll probably jump in within a week or so.)
