On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> 2009/6/4 comex :
>> While everyone else mounts a run on the bank in panic.
>
> If you are trying to improve on the perceived flaws of the PBA I'm
> surprised that you're relying on any human behavior whatsoever.
The above is not a desired outc
2009/6/4 comex :
> While everyone else mounts a run on the bank in panic.
If you are trying to improve on the perceived flaws of the PBA I'm
surprised that you're relying on any human behavior whatsoever.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Benjamin Caplan
wrote:
> Also AGAINST. There must be a better way than invalidating the
> transaction completely. Maybe a general rule for disambiguating?
Well... if you're depositing so many assets (and getting such a low
multiplier) that it's ambiguous, you proba
He had it for B.
On 2009-06-03, Ed Murphy wrote:
> c-walker wrote:
>
>> No, you're right. I thought I had joined. I join the IBA.
>>
>> --
>> C-walker, who clearly intends this message to be public.
>
> NttPF (and there's Agoran precedent that your .sig doesn't work,
> as one cannot rely on every
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> c-walker wrote:
>
>> No, you're right. I thought I had joined. I join the IBA.
>>
>> --
>> C-walker, who clearly intends this message to be public.
>
> NttPF (and there's Agoran precedent that your .sig doesn't work,
> as one cannot rely on every
c-walker wrote:
> No, you're right. I thought I had joined. I join the IBA.
>
> --
> C-walker, who clearly intends this message to be public.
NttPF (and there's Agoran precedent that your .sig doesn't work,
as one cannot rely on everyone being subscribed to a-d)
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:40 PM, comex wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:28 PM, comex wrote:
> >> I initiate a Motion to Amend, specifying the following amendment (in
> >> diff format). The eligible voters are the parties to the IBA,
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:28 PM, comex wrote:
>> I initiate a Motion to Amend, specifying the following amendment (in
>> diff format). The eligible voters are the parties to the IBA, the
>> options are FOR, AGAINST, and PRESENT, and I am th
8 matches
Mail list logo
