On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 8:12 PM Alex Smith wrote:
>
> Come to think of it, "Champion by Championship" is
an "artless redundancy." Very practical things, those.
--
"At this point, given the limited available data, certainty about only a
very small number of things can be achieved." -- Plato, a
Thank you for running a great tournament!
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 9:36 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> Oh yes, and:
>
> 1t's 0v3r s0 1 haz t4|<3n 0ff mi r0b3s T41s r00l 1nva11d f001.
>
> [ooc: thank you all]
>
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > I submit the following rule:
> >
> > I'd l
I think it would be appropriate.
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 9:31 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> I'm pretty sure it's the first *Birthday* tournament/contest win if that's
> a distinction worth making. The previous ones were more like the "free
> tournaments" rule now, and played out over a longer tim
I'm pretty sure it's the first *Birthday* tournament/contest win if that's
a distinction worth making. The previous ones were more like the "free
tournaments" rule now, and played out over a longer time IIRC, less like an
event.
the inspiration for the "birthday" tournament was the wholly-unof
I think I am going to take the approach of renaming it all as a contest.
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 9:16 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> I'll leave it up the the herald, but "Tournaments" are basically synonymous
> with "championship" (they used to be called "championship contests").
> But "championshi
I'll leave it up the the herald, but "Tournaments" are basically synonymous
with "championship" (they used to be called "championship contests").
But "championship" is completely unintuitive so I'd rename em all to
tournament or maybe the more historically-used "contest"?
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, A
That sounds like an interesting mechanism to try to recreate.
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 9:12 PM Alex Smith wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2018-07-16 at 18:06 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > Champions by Tournament, huh. I believe that's a new one.
>
> It's a very similar mechanism to Championship (although admi
It is, but I couldn't think of something better.
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 9:07 PM Aris Merchant
wrote:
>
> Champions by Tournament, huh. I believe that's a new one.
>
> -Aris
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 6:03 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> wrote:
> >
> > Okay, that makes sense.
> >
> > As Heral
On Mon, 2018-07-16 at 18:06 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> Champions by Tournament, huh. I believe that's a new one.
It's a very similar mechanism to Championship (although admittedly one
of the Championship wins was a scam). It may be different enough to
list it separately, though.
Come to think
Champions by Tournament, huh. I believe that's a new one.
-Aris
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 6:03 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
>
> Okay, that makes sense.
>
> As Herald, I grant Aris and myself the patent title Champion.
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 8:58 PM Aris Merchant
> wrote:
> >
> > Re
Regulations 4 and 5 suggest that strikes for invalidity are automatic.
-Aris
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 5:49 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> G., could you declare a strike here? I think you need to before everything
> ends.
>
> Publius Scribon
G., could you declare a strike here? I think you need to before everything ends.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 7:21 PM Aris Merchant
wrote:
>
> I submit the following rule:
>
> I'd like to thank the court for it's service. This tournament was amazing.
> The play was
12 matches
Mail list logo
