Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Enemy] Threat

2010-08-26 Thread ais523
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 17:05 +0200, Keba wrote: > You know that the attempt to rename the City, omd's objection to this > attempt, the CoE and the NoV were all sent to the discussion mailing > list and have therefore no effect? Gah, you're right as well. I wonder how we all missed that? -- ais52

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Enemy] Threat

2010-08-26 Thread Keba
You know that the attempt to rename the City, omd's objection to this attempt, the CoE and the NoV were all sent to the discussion mailing list and have therefore no effect? -- Keba

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Enemy] Threat

2010-08-26 Thread ais523
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 20:19 -0400, Warrigal wrote: > Evidence: I *did* reasonably believe that that message by Alex Smith > was not sent by em, for the simple reason that (due to a technical > glitch, I suppose) I had not received that message from Alex Smith. Is > it unreasonable to assume, based

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Enemy] Threat

2010-08-25 Thread Alex Smith
--- On Wed, 25/8/10, Warrigal wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 6:08 PM, omd > > wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Alex Smith > > > wrote: > >> I intend, without 2 objections from members of > City, to rename City > >> to "The Robot". > > Claim of error: I perceive that this message wa

DIS: Re: BUS: [Enemy] Threat

2010-08-25 Thread Alex Smith
--- On Wed, 25/8/10, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > I create a new Threat: > > Name: The Robot > map symbol: R > >       H = 5 >       d = 2 >       e = 1 >       a = 2 >       s = 1 >       p = 1 I intend, without 2 objections from members of City, to rename City to "The Robot". -- ais523