On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 20:19 -0400, Warrigal wrote: > Evidence: I *did* reasonably believe that that message by Alex Smith > was not sent by em, for the simple reason that (due to a technical > glitch, I suppose) I had not received that message from Alex Smith. Is > it unreasonable to assume, based on the fact that one has not received > a message, that it was not sent? > > I even put "I perceive that" at the beginning of my claim of error.
If you want the NoV to not pass by default, you should probably contest it. -- ais523
