On 1/11/25 13:08, Mischief via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 1/11/25 12:48 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>
>> Hmm. I think I'd argue that, regardless, people who are doing that are
>> not truly subscribed to the forum. For instance, if mail-archive went
>> down but the lists themselves
On 1/11/25 12:48 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
Hmm. I think I'd argue that, regardless, people who are doing that are
not truly subscribed to the forum. For instance, if mail-archive went
down but the lists themselves stayed up, I don't think we'd accept that
the lists have ceased t
On 1/11/25 12:46, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sat, 2025-01-11 at 12:44 -0500, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> On 1/11/25 12:42, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2025-01-10 at 00:47 +, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
Gratu
On Sat, 2025-01-11 at 12:44 -0500, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 1/11/25 12:42, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Fri, 2025-01-10 at 00:47 +, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> > > Gratuitous: I received a copy of this message with only four ">"
> > > charac
On 1/11/25 12:42, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-01-10 at 00:47 +, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
>> Gratuitous: I received a copy of this message with only four ">"
>> characters (the relevant portion is quoted above), so it is at least
>> possible for me to
On Fri, 2025-01-10 at 00:47 +, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> Gratuitous: I received a copy of this message with only four ">"
> characters (the relevant portion is quoted above), so it is at least
> possible for me to tell that the original had a line starting with
> "From ". There are ind
On 1/10/25 12:33, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote:
> Gratuitous: i see 6 >. And no one can prove otherwise. Therefore, take this
> as an argument for IRRELEVANT: the transfer is specifying an ambiguous
> number of spendies, and is therefor invalid.
Is that a true statement? You haven't sent
Gratuitous: i see 6 >. And no one can prove otherwise. Therefore, take this
as an argument for IRRELEVANT: the transfer is specifying an ambiguous
number of spendies, and is therefor invalid.
--
4st
putting jesters cap back on, it fell off while mobile
On Thu, Jan 9, 2025, 4:37 PM Katherina Wals
8 matches
Mail list logo
