secretsnail wrote:
BUT, can we consider the previous messages when evaluating this one for
clear and unambiguous intent to become a player?
YES, and we should by precedent.
If I understand correctly, you specifically meant "evaluating this one
for whether or not there was clear and unambiguou
On Fri, 2022-02-25 at 03:22 -0600, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion
wrote:
> My new and improved, full-proto-judgement of CFJ 3947 follows.
You've done a good job with this! Many of the points you've covered
have been decided before, and I think you've come to the same
conclusions for the same rea
My new and improved, full-proto-judgement of CFJ 3947 follows.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 1:31 PM grok via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> gonna do this all in one message, my apologies for not threading but i
> think it make sense this way.
>
> COE Registrar's report, grok
3 matches
Mail list logo
