DIS: Re: BUS: (@Promotor/@Rulekeepor/Proposal) Airplanes don't operate on belief

2023-04-17 Thread nix via agora-discussion
On 4/17/23 15:44, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote: On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 9:38 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-business < agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: I intend to, without objection, clean R2640 by replacing "indestructable" with "indestructible". I intend to, without objection, cl

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (@Promotor/@Rulekeepor/Proposal) Airplanes don't operate on belief

2023-03-01 Thread Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion
On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 9:55 AM nix via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On 3/1/23 11:37, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote: > > PPS If this proposal is NOT adopted, I will next propose to > > bless the ruleset. (clean all the "syn."s from the ruleset.) > I don't u

DIS: Re: BUS: (@Promotor/@Rulekeepor/Proposal) Airplanes don't operate on belief

2023-03-01 Thread nix via agora-discussion
On 3/1/23 11:37, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote: PPS If this proposal is NOT adopted, I will next propose to bless the ruleset. (clean all the "syn."s from the ruleset.) I don't understand why these are the only two options. I would prefer to add all of these synonyms to the rules they

DIS: Re: BUS: (@Promotor/@Rulekeepor/Proposal) Airplanes don't operate on belief

2023-03-01 Thread Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 9:38 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote: > Unless it has another clear and unambiguous meaning, > for each pair in the following list, text like the first item is > another name for the second item. > - Oppose, Object > - Approve, Support I'm very much opposed to th