Re: DIS: Re: [s-d] [s-b] BUS: RE: ^354 Is Worth More Than What I'd Get For Winning

BobTHJ wrote: > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 14:28, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I remember a proposal or proto to that effect, but the latest FLR >> (through Proposal 5983) doesn't show it, nor do any later proposals >> appear to cover it. Anyone want to research this one further? >> >> > P

Re: DIS: Re: [s-d] [s-b] BUS: RE: ^354 Is Worth More Than What I'd Get For Winning

On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 14:28, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I remember a proposal or proto to that effect, but the latest FLR > (through Proposal 5983) doesn't show it, nor do any later proposals > appear to cover it. Anyone want to research this one further? > > Proposal 5971. BobTHJ

DIS: Re: [s-d] [s-b] BUS: RE: ^354 Is Worth More Than What I'd Get For Winning

BobTHJ wrote: > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 13:43, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 09:44, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Parties to this contract are Murphy, root, Zefram, Wooble, ais523, >>> ehird, Pavitra, avpx, comex, Quazie, 0x44, Charles, and Warrigal; >