BobTHJ wrote:
> Care to specify what you think is going wrong and propose a fix?
I can't think of a fix right now, although I do have some ideas.
First, as we're seeing at the moment, is the unbalancing issues
that a large VP trade can cause. (I'm thinking of comex losing all
eir VP, and spending a
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Do we really
>>> have to treat every contract action as if we were trying to make a wish
>>> with a twisted genie? It's really rather tiresome.
>> Well as far as I can tell
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Goethe wrote:
>> Yes. The fact that you felt the need, in the initial attempt, to give a
>> long-winded explanation of your phrase-interpretation, should be prima
>> facie evidence for a judge that you knew that your int
Goethe wrote:
> Yes. The fact that you felt the need, in the initial attempt, to give a
> long-winded explanation of your phrase-interpretation, should be prima
> facie evidence for a judge that you knew that your interpretation wasn't
> what BobTHJ intended, and you knew that it might not be w
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Alexander Smith wrote:
> Goethe:
>> I read the ticket 4 times and each time came up with the wording
>> BobTHJ intended, not the one you inferred. Even if yours seemed
>> a little more natural to you, the good faith and common sense that
>> are the cornerstone of equity shoul
Goethe:
> I read the ticket 4 times and each time came up with the wording
> BobTHJ intended, not the one you inferred. Even if yours seemed
> a little more natural to you, the good faith and common sense that
> are the cornerstone of equity should have suggested BobTHJ meant
> the other way. -G
BobTHJ wrote:
> I suppose if this is judged TRUE you owe me votes on 27 future proposals.
Yes, but I'm willing to consider deals in which I would refund much of the
scammed VP in exchange for being released from most of the obligations
(that or BobTHJ pledging not to exercise them, which comes to m
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Alexander Smith wrote:
> Well, in that case: there are at least 28 players (I'm not counting
> ehrid or the Left Hand in that count because their registration stati
> are in doubt), and that ticket has been filled once, so it can be filled
> a further 27 times. I therefore fi
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BobTHJ wrote:
>> Buy Ticket
>> Cost: A number of VP equal to 1/3 (rounded down) of the filler's
>> current Voting Limit on Ordinary proposals.
>> Action: Vote in the manner specified by me on a future proposal of my
>> ch
BobTHJ wrote:
> Buy Ticket
> Cost: A number of VP equal to 1/3 (rounded down) of the filler's
> current Voting Limit on Ordinary proposals.
> Action: Vote in the manner specified by me on a future proposal of my
> choice. This ticket may be filled multiple times (a maximum of once
> per each player
10 matches
Mail list logo
